<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Bought a Mac &#187; iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iboughtamac.com/category/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iboughtamac.com</link>
	<description>Safe haven for new Mac users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conspiracy Theory: The iPad v1 isn&#8217;t for consumers!</title>
		<link>http://iboughtamac.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiboughtamac.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fconspiracy-theory-the-ipad-v1-isnt-for-consumers%2F&amp;seed_title=Conspiracy+Theory%3A+The+iPad+v1+isn%26%238217%3Bt+for+consumers%21</link>
		<comments>http://iboughtamac.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiboughtamac.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fconspiracy-theory-the-ipad-v1-isnt-for-consumers%2F&amp;seed_title=Conspiracy+Theory%3A+The+iPad+v1+isn%26%238217%3Bt+for+consumers%21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iboughtamac.com/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, conspiracy theory? Not really, but it made for a good title, haha. Here&#8217;s what I think&#8230;
The iPad (the January demo) isn&#8217;t meant for us everyday consumers at all. It&#8217;s targeted at schools. I read this blog post today from TUAW and it kind of sealed my theories that I was developing in my absent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, conspiracy theory? Not really, but it made for a good title, haha. Here&#8217;s what I think&#8230;</p>
<p>The iPad (the January demo) isn&#8217;t meant for us everyday consumers at all. It&#8217;s targeted at schools. I read this <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/02/03/several-textbook-publishers-sign-ipad-deals/">blog post</a> today from <a href="http://tuaw.com">TUAW</a> and it kind of sealed my theories that I was developing in my absent mind. We have all been asking three major questions about the iPad, right?</p>
<ol>
<li>Why no iSight?</li>
<li>Why no Multitasking?</li>
<li>Why no Flash?</li>
</ol>
<p>I will attempt to answer 2 out of three of these questions (cuz flash just needs to go anyway IMHO). If you were Apple, you might think that you need to sell as many iPads a humanly possible even before they are released. You might also think that the one by one sales market, although lucrative, probably isn&#8217;t the lowest hanging fruit. You may also think that if you could build a product that an institution of hundreds, if not thousands of people could sign on for a big multi-iPad deal, that&#8217;s a better route to cashing in on your nifty ideas. Then you look through your ideas and find this iPad and think, &#8220;What would these Colleges want?&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what they WOULDN&#8217;T want&#8230; Video chat, music, video or anything going on during a lesson. Books on a tablet are awesome and makes for a win in so many ways but allowing these young people with ways to talk to each other or get distracted during MY lesson isn&#8217;t interesting at all. So&#8230; Let&#8217;s release a perfect device for the lowest hanging fruit, make them happy, sell them all out and re-invent for round 2. Then we can sell to the regular public.</p>
<p>I submit there will be several iPad options (and VERY soon). iPad for Education, iPad for People, and iPad for Geeks</p>
<p>More thoughts to come later. Like I said this is just a theory. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iboughtamac.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiboughtamac.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fconspiracy-theory-the-ipad-v1-isnt-for-consumers%2F&amp;seed_title=Conspiracy+Theory%3A+The+iPad+v1+isn%26%238217%3Bt+for+consumers%21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
